The “Bulacio Case” and the Duty to Investigate and Punish
Keywords:
Duty to investigate and punish, Inter–American Court of Human Rights, Bulacio, Miguel Angel EspositoAbstract
The judgment of the Inter–American Court of Human Rights in the case “Bulacio vs. Argentina” extended the duty to investigate and punish the violations of human rights –that the States have according to the American Convention on Human Rights– to other serious crimes, but technically common, restricting competition to national courts to adopt limits to criminal prosecution, when it may generate impunity.
The unreflective application of this judgment by the Supreme Court of Argentina, in the case “Esposito Miguel Ángel”, lead to a lot of critics by the national criminal doctrine since this application would infringe other fundamental rights such as the right of due process and the right of defense.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Lucas LecourThe authors who publish on this journal agree the following terms:
1. Authors guarantee that this is the first publication of the work and that it is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR) which allows others to share the work recognizing the authorship and the initial publication on this journal.
2. Authors may establish additional agreements to non-exclusive distribution of the published work with a recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Articles may be compiled for its publication in books or to be saved in an institutional repository, or personal web page newer than the publication in the Journal.