Intersection of Politics and Ecology: Constitutional Biocentrism in Environmental Permits Regarding Montecristi Hill in Manabí, Ecuador

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.100.028

Keywords:

Constitutional Biocentrism, Montecristi Hill, Community Participation, Environmental Management, Rights of Nature

Abstract

The management of “Cerro de Montecristi” (Manabí, Ecuador) faces challenges in both the environmental and administrative spheres, despite the biocentric safeguards established by the 2008 Constitution. This study focuses on exploring the gap between local policies and the principles set forth in the Constitution, particularly regarding the management of environmental permits and community engagement. For this purpose, field and documentary research methodologies have been utilized to analyze how local administrative practices challenge the biocentric nature of the constitutional legislation. Additionally, measures are proposed to improve environmental management, aimed at being more effective and better aligned with respect for the environment.

References

ARETXAGA BURGOS, R. La Ciencia Astrobiológica, un Nuevo Reto para la Humanidad del Siglo XXI. Bilbao: International Congress, 2003.

ARAÚZ, Maritza. Pueblos indios en la costa ecuatoriana: Jipijapa y Montecristi en la segunda mitad del siglo XVIII. Quito: Ediciones ABYA–YALA, 2000.

CARRERA, C. Rights of Nature, Sustainability and Development in Ecuador. Ecuador, 2008.

CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO DEL AMBIENTE. Ecuador: Asamblea Nacional, 2017.

COIP. “Código Orgánico Integral Penal”. Ecuador: [s.n.], 2021.

COOTAD. “Código Orgánico de Organización Territorial”. Ecuador: [s.n.], 2010.

CONGOPE. Sistema de Áreas de Conservación de la Provincia de Manabí, 2013.

CONSTITUCIÓN DE LA REPÚBLICA DEL ECUADOR. Ecuador: [s.n.], 2008.

CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR (2008). Ecuador: [s.n.], 2008.

CORNEJO, X.; MONTÚFAR, R. Pseudolmedia manabiensis. In: LEÓN–YÁNEZ, S.; VALENCIA, R.; PITMAN, N.; ENDARA, L.; ULLOA ULLOA, C.; NAVARRETE, H. (Eds). Red Book of Endemic Plants of Ecuador. Quito: Publicaciones del Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, 2017. https://acortar.link/mih1ho

DESCOLA, P. Ecología e Cosmología. Sao Paulo: Hucitec, 2000.

DÍAZ NARVÁEZ, V. P. The Concept of Science as a System, Positivism. Barranquilla: Salud Uninorte, 2014.

DOUROJEANNI, A. Procedimientos de Gestión para el Desarrollo Sustentable. Santiago de Chile: Cepal, Eclac, 2000.

DRYZEK, J. “Strategies for Ecological Democratization”. In: LAFERTY, W.M. & MEADOWCROFT, J. Democracy and the Environment. Problems and Perspectives. Great Britain: Cheltelham, 2006.

Ecuador. Ministry of the Environment. Protected Areas of Ecuador. 2016 https://acortar.link/TBenYJ

GALEANO, E. La Naturaleza no es Muda. Spain: Brecha Weekly, 2009.

GUDYNAS, E. The Ecological Mandate. Derechos de la Naturaleza y Políticas Ambientales. Quito: Editorial AbyaYala, 2009.

KIMERLING, J. Amazon Crude. Natural Resources Defense Council, Brickfront Graphics, Inc., U.S.A., 1991.

MAYOR, F. The Limits to Growth. Mexico City: [s.n.], 2009.

NAESS, A. A Deep Ecology Advocacy Movement. [s.l.]: Environmental Ethics, 1984.

Provincial Government of Manabí. Tourism in the province of Manabí. 2018 https://acortar.link/JOLUKu

SAUVÉ, L. A Mapping of Currents in Environmental Education. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2005.

SCHWEITZER, A. Reverence for Life: The Ethics of Albert Schweitzer. New York: Open Road, 2014.

United Nations Conference on Environmen and Development (UNCED) (1992). Earth Summit Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro. https://acortar.link/fGge3N

UNITED NATIONS. Human Rights, Questions and Answers. United States: United Nations, 1987.

UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Conference on the Environment. Stockholm: [n.d.], 1972.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Vargas Párraga, L. E., Duque Solórzano , M. C., & Rivera Coria, W. B. (2024). Intersection of Politics and Ecology: Constitutional Biocentrism in Environmental Permits Regarding Montecristi Hill in Manabí, Ecuador. República Y Derecho, 10(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.100.028