What Happens in Federal Courts of Appeals, Stays in Federal Courts of Appeals. The Supreme Court Stands Up for En Banc Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.100.004Keywords:
En banc procedure, Supreme Court, Rehearing en banc, Vidal, Court of appeals, PrecedentAbstract
The article analyzes the Argentine Supreme Court’s decision in “Vidal”, in which the highest court had to intervene because of a sustained conflict between panel III of the Federal Court of Criminal Cassation and the rest of the panels of that Court. That contradiction between panels also meant ignoring a controlling precedent from the Supreme Court itself (“Palero”). The work evidences, through the analysis of the Court’s discourse and of the precedents on point, certain deficiencies within mechanisms of uniformity of jurisprudence in federal courts as well as the unwillingness of judges to overcome them.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Florencia RattiThe authors who publish on this journal agree the following terms:
1. Authors guarantee that this is the first publication of the work and that it is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR) which allows others to share the work recognizing the authorship and the initial publication on this journal.
2. Authors may establish additional agreements to non-exclusive distribution of the published work with a recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Articles may be compiled for its publication in books or to be saved in an institutional repository, or personal web page newer than the publication in the Journal.