Contingency in Dialogic Constitutionalism. An Analysis from the Depenalisation of Abortion in Argentina

Authors

Keywords:

Deliberative democracy, Dialogue, Fundamental rights, Popular participation, Judicial review

Abstract

Roberto Gargarella’s recent book, Law as a conversation among equals, invites us to reflect on a trend that has emerged in the recent years: the so–called dialogic constitutionalism. This trend is characterized by a defense of deliberative democracy, as well as by the criticism of the idea that rights are best protected in the courts. In this framework, the argument I intend to support is that dialogic constitutionalism, as theorized by Roberto Gargarella is not oriented towards protecting the contingency of politics through counter–democratic institutions, but rather defends institutions that are prone to inclusive dialogue and sensitive to such contingency.

Author Biography

Carlos Ignacio Giuffre, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (España)

Docente e Investigador Predoctoral (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Master in Global Rule of Law and Constitutional Democracy (Università degli Studi di Genova y Universitat de Girona), Máster en Derecho Constitucional (Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, y Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo), Especialista en Derecho Constitucional (UCA) y Abogado (Universidad de Mendoza).

Downloads

Published

2022-06-09

How to Cite

Giuffre, C. I. (2022). Contingency in Dialogic Constitutionalism. An Analysis from the Depenalisation of Abortion in Argentina. República Y Derecho, 7(7), 1–22. Retrieved from https://revistaryd.derecho.uncu.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/245

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 7 (2022): Vol. 7, N° 7 (2022): (Continuous publication) Dossier: Constitution and Democracy. Reflections on "Law as a conversation between equals" by Roberto Gargarella

Section

Dossier

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Carlos Ignacio Giuffre

The authors who publish on this journal agree the following terms:

1. Authors guarantee that this is the first publication of the work and that it is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR) which allows others to share the work recognizing the authorship and the initial publication on this journal.

2. Authors may establish additional agreements to non-exclusive distribution of the published work with a recognition of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Articles may be compiled for its publication in books or to be saved in an institutional repository, or personal web page newer than the publication in the Journal.